Biography
Tae-in Ohm has been Professor at the Department of Environmental Engineering, Hanbat National University since 1995. He is interested in designing of incinerator for wastes, municipal solid waste, waste refrigerant, liquid industrial wastes and RDF. Also, he has experience in drying technology of organic waste with high water content.
Abstract
The reuse of hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) with a global warming potential (GWP) of >150 is prohibited in developed countries. Decomposition and subsequent neutralization of the produced hydrogen fluorides is currently widely used for the treatment of high-GWP waste HFCs. However, there is the need to reduce the high auxiliary energy consumption of the utilized incinerator. For this purpose, we developed two versions of a burner for injecting fuel, oxidizer, refrigerant, and steam into the incinerator. The simultaneous supply of the waste HFCs and steam into the incinerator was expected to enhance the destruction of the former, thereby reducing the energy consumption. The following were determined from the results of experiments that were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of the developed type-1 burner. The simultaneous supply of steam and waste HFCs into the incinerator increased the internal temperature of the incinerator when using either version of the type-2 burner. With the simultaneous supply of steam and the HFCs, the internal temperature of the incinerator increases with increasing steam supply, regardless of the version of the burner used. When using the type-2 burner, by which steam is supplied to the incinerator in the same direction as the flame, the NOx concentration decreases from 71 ppm to 62 ppm with increasing steam feed rate. In the case of using the type-1 burner, there is no decrease in the NOx concentration. The HFCs decomposition rate is 100% for a HFCs feed rate of up to 2.8 kg/h with no steam supply, while the 100% decomposition is maintained up to HFCs feed rates of 3.0 and 3.4 kg/h when using the types 1 and 2 burners with steam supply. The decomposition rate of the HFCs for the two types of burners are the same for steam feed rates above 0.5 kg/h. Recent Publications 1. Ohm T I, Myung S Y, Jang W B and Yu S R (2015) A comparison of refrigerant management policies and suggestions for improvement in South Korea. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19(2):631–644. 2. Jasinski M, Dors M and Mizeraczyk J (2009) Destruction of freon HFC-134a using a nozzleless microwave plasma source. Plasma Chem Plasma Process 29(5):363–372. 3. Watanabe T and Tsuru T (2008) Water plasma generation under atmospheric pressure for HFC destruction. Thin Solid Films 516(13):4391–4396. 4. Hannus I (1999) Adsorption and transformation of halogenated hydrocarbons over zeolites. Appl Catal. 189:263–276. 5. Wang H P, Liao S H, Lin K S, Huang Y J and Wang H C (1998) Pyrolysis of PU/CFCs wastes. J Hazard Mater 58:221–226.
Biography
Marium Alleyne is currently pursuing a PhD in Environmental Studies with specialization in Climate Change Vulnerability at the University of the West Indies, Cave Hill Campus, Barbados, W. I. She has her expertise in natural resource and environmental management, with an emphasis on climate change and is dedicated to contributing to the work on vulnerability and adaptive capacity to climate change and disaster risk management and reduction in Small Island Developing States (SIDS). She has four years’ experience, working on 14 climate change related projects in the Caribbean region. She has comprehensive knowledge of climate variability and climate change and its impacts on SIDS; experience in designing and structuring solutions that address/mitigate disaster and climate risks and contributed to increase climate change awareness and capacity at the country level.
Abstract
Climate change is a high consequence issue for Small Island Developing States (SIDS) due to its proportional impact. While climate change is expected to aggravate environmental and socioeconomic conditions, SIDS possesses inherent characteristics which make them highly vulnerable to climate change. Vulnerability is a critical framework used to delineate the extent of climate change. A comprehensive understanding of the vulnerability of Caribbean SIDS specific to climate change will become a fundamental factor in ensuring sustainability and viability, as it provides the foundation for the identification of the optimum restorative action to reduce impacts through effective implementation. Traditional approaches to climate vulnerability assessment are limited by their ability to be transferred to SIDS, specifically the Caribbean region. Vulnerability is dynamic and despite strides in research, there is limited knowledge about the manner in which the dynamism of vulnerability operates, but any assessment methodology or tool must possess the ability to determine a balance in the system and any trends occurring. As knowledge about climate change impacts increases and changes in socio-economic and political circumstances occur there will be a continuous demand and need for new vulnerability approaches, tools and methods. Focusing on Caribbean SIDS, this research seeks to review the existing climate change vulnerability assessment methodologies, tools and models, highlighting strengths, weaknesses and resultant gaps, and pays particular attention to the potential elements of transferability to SIDS, with the aim of these to the Caribbean context. The resultant information will be used to develop a climate change VCA Model for Caribbean SIDS, based on the adaptation of VCA tools and methodologies for SIDS. This research contributes a climate change VCA model for Caribbean SIDS which could be applicable to others. Recent Publications 1. Kelman I (2018) Islandness within climate change narratives of Small Island Developing States (SIDS). Island Studies Journal 13(1):149–166. 2. Scandurra G, A A Romano, M Ronghi, and A Carfora (2018) On the vulnerability of Small Island Developing States: A dynamic analysis. Ecological Indicators 84:382–392. 3. Jurgilevich Alexandra, Aleksi Räsänen, Fanny Groundstroem and Sirkku Juhola (2017) A systematic review of dynamics in climate risk and vulnerability assessments. Environmental Research Letters 12(1):013002. 4. Mcleod Elizabeth, Shawn W Margles weis, Supin Wongbusarakum, Meghan Gombos, Angie Dazé, et al. (2015) Community-based climate vulnerability and adaptation tools: a review of tools and their